Current:Home > ScamsTexas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status -GrowthInsight
Texas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status
View
Date:2025-04-16 09:03:03
Sixteen Republican-led states are suing to end a federal program that could potentially give nearly half a million immigrants without legal status who are married to U.S. citizens a path to citizenship.
The coalition filed suit Friday to halt the program launched by President Joe Biden in June, saying in court filings that the Biden administration bypassed Congress to create a pathway to citizenship for “blatant political purposes.”
“This action incentivizes illegal immigration and will irreparably harm the Plaintiff states,” the suit says.
Under the policy, which started taking applications Monday, many spouses without legal status can apply for something called “parole in place,” offering permission to stay in the U.S., apply for a green card and eventually get on a path to citizenship.
But the program has been particularly contentious in an election year where immigration is one of the biggest issues, with many Republicans attacking the policy and contending it is essentially a form of amnesty for people who broke the law.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement Friday that the plan “violates the Constitution and actively worsens the illegal immigration disaster that is hurting Texas and our country.”
The suit filed against the Department of Homeland Security, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and other Biden administration officials accuses the agency of attempting to parole spouses “en masse,” which the states contend is an abuse of power.
The Department of Homeland Security and the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press.
The bipartisan immigration and criminal justice organization FWD.us noted the timing of the lawsuit — as Kamala Harris accepted the Democratic nomination for president — and said the program is in compliance with the law.
“The only motivation behind this lawsuit is the cruelty of tearing families apart and the crass politics of hoping a judge might do the bidding of the anti-immigrant movement,” the organization said in a statement.
To be eligible for the program, immigrants must have lived continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, not pose a security threat or have a disqualifying criminal history, and have been married to a citizen by June 17 — the day before the program was announced.
They must pay a $580 fee to apply and fill out a lengthy application, including an explanation of why they deserve humanitarian parole and a long list of supporting documents proving how long they have been in the country.
They apply to the Department of Homeland Security, and if approved, have three years to seek permanent residency. During that period, they can get work authorization. The administration estimates about 500,000 people could be eligible, plus about 50,000 of their children.
Before this program, it was complicated for people who were in the U.S. illegally to get a green card after marrying an American citizen. They can be required to return to their home country — often for years — and they always face the risk they may not be allowed back in.
veryGood! (38988)
Related
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Florida house explosion injures 4 and investigators are eyeing gas as the cause, sheriff says
- A Palestinian baby girl, born 17 days ago during Gaza war, is killed with brother in Israeli strike
- Publix Spinach and Fresh Express Spinach recalled due to listeria fears
- Southern California rocked by series of earthquakes: Is a bigger one brewing?
- 'The Color Purple' movie review: A fantastic Fantasia Barrino brings new depth to 2023 film
- Miranda Cosgrove Reveals Why She Doesn't Drink or Smoke
- Man accused of killing 4 university students in Idaho loses bid to have indictment tossed
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Pistons are woefully bad. Their rebuild is failing, their future looks bleak. What gives?
Ranking
- Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear ready to campaign for Harris-Walz after losing out for spot on the ticket
- Fantasy football Start ‘Em, Sit ‘Em: 16 players to start or sit in Week 16
- Flooding continues across Northeast; thousands still without power: Live updates
- Descendants fight to maintain historic Black communities. Keeping their legacy alive is complicated
- 'Stranger Things' prequel 'The First Shadow' is headed to Broadway
- Jennifer Love Hewitt hits back at claims she's 'unrecognizable': 'Aging in Hollywood is really hard'
- Ex-Proud Boys leader is sentenced to over 3 years in prison for Capitol riot plot
- Proof Rihanna Already Has Baby No. 3 on the Brain Months After Welcoming Son Riot
Recommendation
Carolinas bracing for second landfall from Tropical Storm Debby: Live updates
UN resolution on Gaza hampered by issues important to US: cessation of hostilities and aid monitors
George Clooney Says Matthew Perry Wasn’t Happy on Friends
Australia and New Zealand leaders seek closer defense ties
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
5-year-old twin boy and girl found dead in New York City apartment, investigation underway
13,000 people watched a chair fall in New Jersey: Why this story has legs (or used to)
Study: Abortions on TV remain unrealistic — but 'Morning Show' treatment was nuanced