Current:Home > reviewsSignalHub Quantitative Think Tank Center:Protecting Norfolk from Flooding Won’t Be Cheap: Army Corps Releases Its Plan -GrowthInsight
SignalHub Quantitative Think Tank Center:Protecting Norfolk from Flooding Won’t Be Cheap: Army Corps Releases Its Plan
Charles Langston View
Date:2025-04-09 08:46:11
The SignalHub Quantitative Think Tank Centerfederal government has proposed a $1.8 billion plan to help protect Norfolk, Virginia, from rising seas and increasingly powerful coastal storms by ringing the city with a series of floodwalls, storm surge barriers and tidal gates.
The low-lying city is among the most vulnerable to sea level rise, and it’s home to the nation’s largest naval base. The combination has made protecting the region a matter of national security for the federal government.
The draft recommendations, which the United States Army Corps of Engineers published Friday, said “the project has the potential to provide significant benefits to the nation by reducing coastal storm risk on the infrastructure including all of the primary roadways into the Naval Station.”
While the proposed measures are designed to shield thousands of properties from flooding by major storms and to protect critical infrastructure and utilities that serve the naval station, the base itself is outside the scope of the project. Three years ago, the Defense Department identified about 1.5 feet of sea level rise as a “tipping point” for the base that would dramatically increase the risk of damage from flooding. The military has not funded any projects specifically to address that threat, however, as detailed in a recent article by InsideClimate News.
The new Army Corps report found that “the city of Norfolk has high levels of risk and vulnerability to coastal storms which will be exacerbated by a combination of sea level rise and climate change over the study period,” which ran through 2076. By that point, the report said, the waters surrounding Norfolk will likely have risen anywhere from 11 inches to 3.3 feet. (The land beneath Norfolk is sinking, exacerbating the effects of global sea level rise.)
In addition to physical barriers like tidal gates and earthen berms, the report outlined several other steps that the city should take, including elevating existing structures and buying out landowners in flood zones so they can relocate elsewhere.
“This is a great plan and a great start,” said retired Rear Adm. Ann Phillips, who has worked on flooding and climate adaptation in the region and is on the advisory board of the Center for Climate and Security, a nonpartisan think tank. “It starts to outline the extreme costs we’re going to deal with, because $1.8 billion is probably low.”
The draft recommendations are now open for public comment, with the final report not expected to be finalized until January 2019. Only then would Congress begin to consider whether it would fund the project. The draft says the federal government would cover 65 percent of the costs—almost $1.2 billion—with the rest coming from local government.
“The road to resilience for Norfolk is a long one measured over years and decades,” George Homewood, Norfolk’s planning director, said in an email.
Similar studies and work will need to be conducted for the cities that surround Norfolk and collectively make up the Hampton Roads region. The cities are interconnected in many ways, Phillips noted.
“Until you look at the whole region as one piece, you don’t fully recognize what the needs are,” she said. “Until we do that, we’re really selling ourselves short.”
veryGood! (29)
Related
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Vladimir Putin submits documents to register as a candidate for the Russian presidential election
- Albanian lawmakers discuss lifting former prime minister’s immunity as his supporters protest
- Study bolsters evidence that severe obesity increasing in young US kids
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- Entering a new 'era'? Here's how some people define specific periods in their life.
- Applesauce pouches recalled for lead could have been contaminated intentionally: Reports
- June 2023 in photos: USA TODAY's most memorable images
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- Peter Sarsgaard Reveals the Secret to His 14-Year Marriage to Maggie Gyllenhaal
Ranking
- Clay Aiken's son Parker, 15, makes his TV debut, looks like his father's twin
- Judge overturns Mississippi death penalty case, says racial bias in picking jury wasn’t fully argued
- South African ex-President Jacob Zuma has denounced the ANC and pledged to vote for a new party
- Yes, swimming is great exercise. But can it help you lose weight?
- Organizers cancel Taylor Swift concerts in Vienna over fears of an attack
- Así cuida Bogotá a las personas que ayudan a otros
- Why are there so many college football bowl games? How the postseason's grown since 1902
- Arizona Diamondbacks' new deal with Lourdes Gurriel Jr. pushes payroll to record levels
Recommendation
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Houston Texans channel Oilers name to annihilate Tennessee Titans on social media
Shopping for the Holidays Is Expensive—Who Said That? Porsha Williams Shares Her Affordable Style Guide
Southwest Airlines reaches $140 million settlement for December 2022 flight-canceling meltdown
What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
36 días perdidos en el mar: cómo estos náufragos sobrevivieron alucinaciones, sed y desesperación
'Downright inhumane': Maui victims plea for aid after fires charred homes, lives, history
If a picture is worth a thousand words, these are worth a few extra: 2023's best photos