Current:Home > NewsA new front opens over South Dakota ballot initiatives: withdrawing signatures from petitions -GrowthInsight
A new front opens over South Dakota ballot initiatives: withdrawing signatures from petitions
View
Date:2025-04-14 12:04:04
South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem has signed a bill to allow signers of ballot initiative petitions to revoke their signatures — a move opponents decry as a jab at direct democracy and a proposed abortion rights initiative, which would enable voters to protect abortion rights in the state constitution.
The Republican governor signed the bill on Friday. The Republican-led Legislature overwhelmingly passed the bill brought by Republican Rep. Jon Hansen, who leads a group seeking to defeat the proposed initiative. Hansen said he brought the bill to counter misleading or fraudulent initiative tactics, alleging “multiple violations of our laws regarding circulation.”
“Inducing somebody into signing a petition through misleading information or fraud, that’s not democracy. That’s fraud,” Hansen said in an interview last month. “This upholds the ideal of democracy, and that is people deciding, one or the other, based on the truth of the matter.”
Republican lawmakers have grumbled about South Dakota’s initiative process, including Medicaid expansion, which voters approved in 2022.
Democrats tabbed Hansen’s bill as “changing the rules in the middle of the game,” and called it open to potential abuse, with sufficient laws already on the books to ensure initiatives are run properly.
Opponents also decry the bill’s emergency clause, giving it effect upon Noem’s signature, denying the opportunity for a referendum. Rick Weiland, who leads the abortion rights initiative, called the bill “another attack on direct democracy.”
“It’s pretty obvious that our legislature doesn’t respect the will of the voters or this long-held tradition of being able to petition our state government and refer laws that voters don’t like, pass laws that the Legislature refuses to move forward on, and amend our state constitution,” Weiland said.
South Dakota outlaws all abortions but to save the life of the mother.
The bill is “another desperate attempt to throw another hurdle, another roadblock” in the initiative’s path, Weiland said. Initiative opponents have sought to “convince people that they signed something that they didn’t understand,” he said.
If voters approve the proposed initiative, the state would be banned from regulating abortion in the first trimester. Regulations for the second trimester would be allowed “only in ways that are reasonably related to the physical health of the pregnant woman.”
Dakotans for Health has until May 7 to submit about 35,000 valid signatures to make the November ballot. Weiland said they have more than 50,000 signatures, 44,000 of them “internally validated.”
It’s unclear how the new law might affect the initiative. Weiland said he isn’t expecting mass revocations, but will see how the law is implemented.
The law requires signature withdrawal notifications be notarized and delivered by hand or registered mail to the secretary of state’s office before the petition is filed and certified.
veryGood! (9647)
Related
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- AI-generated voices in robocalls can deceive voters. The FCC just made them illegal
- A migraine is more than just a bad headache. Here's what causes them.
- We know about Kristin Juszczyk's clothing line. Why don't we know about Kiya Tomlin's?
- Illinois Gov. Pritzker calls for sheriff to resign after Sonya Massey shooting
- Man accused of killing a priest in Nebraska pleads not guilty
- A year after Ohio derailment, U.S. freight trains remain largely unregulated
- Gambling addicts face tough test as Super Bowl 58 descends on Las Vegas and NFL cashes in
- Residents in Alaska capital clean up swamped homes after an ice dam burst and unleashed a flood
- Nevada high court dismisses casino mogul Steve Wynn’s defamation suit against The Associated Press
Ranking
- 9/11 hearings at Guantanamo Bay in upheaval after surprise order by US defense chief
- In possible test of federal labor law, Georgia could make it harder for some workers to join unions
- In rural Utah, concern over efforts to use Colorado River water to extract lithium
- NYC vigilantes 'Guardian Angels' tackle New Yorker on live TV, misidentify him as migrant
- Euphoria's Hunter Schafer Says Ex Dominic Fike Cheated on Her Before Breakup
- Utah governor says school board member who questioned a student’s gender ‘embarrassed the state’
- Kobe Bryant statue to be unveiled before Los Angeles Lakers' game vs. Denver Nuggets
- Shariah Harris makes history as first Black woman to play in US Open Women's Polo Championship
Recommendation
Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
Why Saudi Arabia is building a new city in the desert
New Hampshire Senate votes to move state primary from September to June. The House wants August
17-year-old boy shot and killed by police during welfare check in Columbus, Nebraska
American news website Axios laying off dozens of employees
Senators ask CEOs why their drugs cost so much more in the U.S.
Wisconsin Elections Commission votes to tell clerks to accept partial addresses on absentee ballots
Tablescaping Essentials to Elevate Your Next Dinner Party Aesthetic